The investor who finds this evidence first wins. Everyone else is still researching.
You don't have a research problem. You have a speed problem.
Right now, there's a site on your spreadsheet. Maybe three. The numbers work. The area's right. You can see the scheme.
But you can't move. Not because you haven't done the research — you've done too much. You've pulled the Local Plan. Scrolled through the planning portal. Found comparable approvals. Maybe run it through Searchland or Planda. Maybe paid a consultant four hundred pounds to tell you "it should be fine, but there are no guarantees."
And after all of that — weeks of it — you're no closer to a straight answer than when you started.
Meanwhile, someone else is looking at the same site. They don't have better instincts. They don't have more money. They just need less time to decide.
The investor who wins in this market is not the one with the best deal. It's the one who can make the best decision fastest.
And right now, everything available to you is designed to slow you down.
"My only regret is not finding him sooner on my journey. If I think back to the start, having someone like Ian to learn from would have been so incredible and would have shaved literal months off the learning curve."
Here's what finding a straight answer on planning actually looks like in 2026. Be honest about how much of this is your life.
You go to the council's planning portal. The interface looks like it was built in 2004 — because it was. You search for comparable applications. Half the results are irrelevant. You click through to find the decision notice. Then you need the officer's report. Different link. Sometimes a different system entirely.
A real council planning portal — this is what you're up against
You find a decision notice. Approved. Good. But what does it actually tell you? The outcome. Not the reasoning. For that, you need the officer's report — a 15-page document written in language that sounds like English but functions as code.
You find three officer reports. You read them. You're not sure what you're looking for. You're not sure which details matter and which are boilerplate. You spend four hours building a picture that still doesn't answer the question: will the council say yes to MY scheme?
Now multiply that by six sites. Across two councils. Every month.
It's 2026. You can get a same-day mortgage decision. You can buy a house at auction on your phone. You can get AI to write your marketing, do your accounts, and plan your meals.
But figuring out whether a council will grant planning permission? That's still weeks of manual grind through broken portals, buried documents, and reports written to be technically accurate and strategically useless. Nobody has solved this. Because nobody has done the work.
Until now.
Let me show you what speed looks like when it's powered by intelligence.
Your AI tool tells you: "This council approved 68% of residential applications in 2024."
That sounds useful. It isn't. Here's what the intelligence reveals underneath that number:
| Development Type | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMO Conversions | 41% | 29% | 22% | ▼ Collapsing |
| Loft Conversions (with dormers) | 74% | 77% | 83% | ▲ Strengthening |
| Bungalow Replacements | 62% | 45% | 31% | ▼ Collapsing |
| Rear Extensions (single storey) | 88% | 91% | 93% | ▬ Stable |
| Commercial to Residential | 55% | 68% | 79% | ▲ Strengthening |
That 68% headline is hiding five different stories.
HMO and bungalow replacement rates are in freefall — both driven by a design guide adopted in late 2022 that introduced garden-size ratios and "character protection" language. Officers now have a policy tool they didn't have three years ago, and they're using it.
But the same design guide relaxed parking requirements for town-centre conversions. Commercial-to-residential rates are climbing for exactly that reason. Same document. Opposite effects.
Without this intelligence: you spend three weeks researching an HMO conversion, submit into a 22% approval rate, and discover the hard way that the council has quietly been killing this development type for two years.
With this intelligence: you see the table. You pivot in ten minutes. Same borough, different development type. Commercial conversions at 79% and climbing. You're submitting while your competitor is still trying to decode officer reports on a doomed HMO.
That's what speed looks like. Not rushing. Not cutting corners. Seeing the full picture instantly.
"Not only did they overturn and approve my HMO application, but they also removed my condition that I would need to block up my hallway and create a new entrance into the downstairs bedroom which saves me on refurbishment costs. So great news."
So what actually gives you this picture? Two things. And neither works alone.
A structured database of planning appeal decisions covering every council in England from 2016 to 2025. Not portal summaries. Not AI-generated snapshots. The substance: inspector reasoning, policies cited and ignored, appeal outcomes, refusal triggers, approval rates broken down by development type, by ward, by year.
Nobody else has this. Not at any consultancy. Not at any proptech company. Not at the councils themselves.
The council doesn't know its own patterns. I do.
I spent years as a planning officer at Camden Council. I wrote the reports. Made the recommendations. Sat in committee. Defended decisions at appeal. I know how evidence gets weighed because I was the one weighing it.
When you read an officer's report, you see a recommendation. When I read the same report, I see the reasoning underneath.
Any former officer has the lens. But no former officer has this dataset. And no dataset produces intelligence without the lens to interpret it.
You've tried things before. Consultants who hedged. AI tools that gave you confidence scores and left you to figure out what they meant. Pre-apps that took eight weeks to say "maybe." They all disappointed. So let me answer the question you're actually asking: what does this data DO for me?
You don't scrape planning portals. You don't hunt for decision notices. You don't read officer reports and guess what they mean. That entire grind — the one that eats your evenings and still doesn't answer the question — is done. For you.
The most expensive thing in your business isn't a refusal. It's the three months you spent researching a site that was never going to get approved. Bad sites die in 48 hours, not 48 weeks.
When you can see what a council is actually approving right now, on your development type, in your target wards, you don't guess where the opportunities are. They're in the data. You pivot. You move.
Not one site. Not one comparable. The whole landscape — delivered, interpreted, actionable.
Every week a site sits frozen on your spreadsheet, someone with faster intelligence is looking at the same opportunity. The Planning Edge doesn't just make you smarter. It makes you faster. And in this market, faster wins.
A planning intelligence membership that gives you the complete picture of what your councils approve and refuse — and delivers it fast enough to act on. Here's exactly how it works.
You choose two councils. These become your intelligence territories — the markets where you'll have an advantage nobody else in those boroughs can match.
The Council Performance Dashboard — every council in England, at a glance
The Site Assessment Scorecard — evaluate any site through the planning lens
A Site Review in action — real planning intelligence, not guesswork
The Council Intelligence Report — what officers are approving and refusing right now
| Decision Speed | Cost | If Wrong | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-app to council | 6–8 weeks | £300+ | Nothing happens |
| Planning consultant | 2–3 weeks | £1,500+ | Nothing happens |
| AI planning tool | Instant (you interpret) | £50–200/month | Nothing happens |
| The Planning Edge | 48 hours (interpreted for you) | £297/month | I pay you |
I don't hedge. I don't caveat. I give verdicts and I back them with money.
Full access. Full service. If the intelligence hasn't changed how you evaluate sites within 30 days, every penny back. Keep everything you've received. No questions.
I'll give you a Red on your dream site if the data says Red. I'd rather lose a subscriber than watch you lose £30,000. My financial incentive and your financial safety point in exactly the same direction.
If the council refuses on something my evidence base should have caught, my fees are refunded. Not capped. Refunded. Thousands of pounds on the line. Find another planning professional who puts their income at risk against their own verdicts.
Every pound you pay in subscription accumulates toward consultancy fees. Your membership isn't a sunk cost — it's a deposit on deeper engagement whenever you're ready.
One wrong planning decision costs you £15,000 to £50,000. Application fees. Architect fees. Surveys. Holding costs. Dead time.
But here's the cost nobody counts: one frozen site per year at £30,000 average profit potential. Not lost to a refusal — lost to indecision. Over three years, that's £90,000. Over five years, £150,000.
The arithmetic is not close.
The Planning Edge is new. The judgment behind it isn't.
"Ian's site reviews are an indispensable part of my acquisition process. The depth of analysis and clarity of recommendations have helped me make informed decisions on several complex sites. Highly recommended for anyone serious about maximising development potential."
"Just wanted to say a huge thank you for the time you spent with me. Our efforts have finally paid off and I have just received the official prior approval not required letter!!!! I fell off my chair! Well my train seat... and punched the air!"
A conservation officer preparing for an inquiry — the most technical and highest level of appeal there is — after receiving a planning intelligence report at 9pm. Unprompted. At 5:43 in the morning. Built using the same dataset, the same lens, that produces every verdict inside The Planning Edge.
I'm Ian Gracie. Former planning officer at the London Borough of Camden. I spent years writing the reports, making the recommendations, sitting in committee, and defending decisions at appeal.
Since leaving, I've built something that didn't exist: a structured dataset of appeal decisions spanning every English council from 2016 to 2025. Not scraped portal summaries. Structured intelligence — inspector reasoning, policy citations, decision patterns, outcome trends.
I operate from Thailand.
Planning intelligence is about data and lens, not geography. I don't need to visit your site. I need to read the decisions your council has already made, interpret them through the lens of the officer who'll decide your application, and tell you what the evidence says.
Find the best place to invest anywhere in the country, from anywhere in the world. That's what the intelligence makes possible — for me, and for you.
Every verdict is me, personally, reading the evidence and making the call. That depth doesn't scale past ten members at this stage.
P.S. Here's what nobody tells you about planning intelligence: it doesn't just change your decisions. It changes what kind of investor you are. Right now, you're the investor who researches for weeks, asks around, gets conflicting answers, and either freezes or gambles. With The Planning Edge, you become the investor who decides fastest from the best information available. The one who sends a site on Sunday and has a verdict by Tuesday. The one whose pipeline moves instead of sitting frozen. You stop being the investor who guesses. You become the investor who knows.
P.P.S. Don't count your refusals. Count the sites sitting in your pipeline right now that you can't move on. Each one represents a deal that's either viable or not — and you can't tell which. A Green Light turns a frozen site into a live deal. A Red Light turns a frozen site into freed-up capital. Either way, you stop sitting. How much is your frozen pipeline worth if you could move on it tomorrow?
P.P.P.S. One correct decision in eight years. That's the break-even. Not the ceiling — the floor. If you're doing two or more deals a year, you'll clear it in month one. 10 spots. £297/month. Then £497.